by danielcmckenzie | Mar 10, 2020 | Uncategorized
Of course, many San Franciscans, old-timers and new arrivals alike, do support restoration, as do residents of San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties who purchase water from San Francisco. While we cherish all our supporters, it is especially gratifying when we get new ones who “drink the water”.
In all we presently count 5,112 supporters, spread throughout California and across the United States, with a handful in various other countries. (This count of supporters are folks who have contributed financially – there are many others who support us on social media and/or receive our email updates. We don’t know where most of these folks live, but we are grateful to them as well.)
Not surprisingly, most support comes from California where 4332 supporters are scattered in 54 of 58 counties (Alpine, Glenn, Modoc and Sierra are missing). The top ten counties are shown below.
Nationwide, Restore Hetch Hetchy has supporters in 47 states – Delaware, Kansas and North Dakota are missing. The top 10, after California, are shown below.
As always, we ask our supporters to help spread the word. It would be great to bring in representatives of Alpine, Glenn, Modoc and Sierra Counties and of Delaware, Kansas and North Dakota.
Most importantly, we need to reach out to people in San Francisco. We do need to work with the multi-generational, Hetch Hetchy-in-their-DNA crowd whenever possible. And it is essential that we bring in young people, whether they are native San Franciscans or more recent arrivals, who have a strong environmental ethos and wish to make Yosemite National Park whole again.
by danielcmckenzie | Feb 9, 2020 | Uncategorized
CalMatters has posted our op ed “Once again, San Francisco officials are limiting public access to the majestic Hetch Hetchy Valley”. CalMatters is digital-only, but widely-read and well-respected. Governor Newsom posted his water commentary there last week as well.
Please read the Op Ed at Cal Matters. It speaks for itself, but a few points warrant emphasis:
- Restore Hetch Hetchy is confident that improved access at Hetch Hetchy, whether by eco-friendly boat or other means, will help build support for emptying the reservoir and restoring the valley.
- Until the reservoir is emptied and the valley restored, a quiet, electric, park service-operated tour boat, or rental canoe or kayak, would be a wonderful way to visit the area – even for people who do not normally boat on reservoirs.
- The shenanigans* that took place in December may be all too common and seem minor compared to other issues before Congress. The effort is, however, nonetheless egregious. Without any public review or discussion, the action directly undermines the Raker Act which, whether we like its outcome or not, was substantially debated in 1913.
- As our Op Ed points out, the boating ban comes in a side report to the must-pass bill, not in the bill itself, so its legal standing is ambiguous. We don’t read it as binding. Stay tuned …
by danielcmckenzie | Feb 2, 2020 | Uncategorized
San Francisco officials have hyped the City’s water quality for more than a century, using it to justify damming an iconic landscape in Yosemite National Park. That hype may be coming back to bite them as the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission seeks to diversify its water system.
To be fair, the water quality is good. But it will continue to be good when Hetch Hetchy Valley is returned to its natural splendor.
While many of us think of Hetch Hetchy as a valley waiting to be reborn, the term “Hetch Hetchy” is often used as a moniker for San Francisco’s water system, or for the water itself. Officials have often bragged that the water is so pure its doesn’t require filtration (though it is treated with a combination of chlorine, ammonia and ultraviolet light to ensure pathogens are eliminated).
As a result, a handful of customers will always complain whenever there is a change in San Francisco’s Regional Water System. In 2017, when the PUC announced its plan to add groundwater to supplies on the western side of San Francisco (see below), the SF Chronicle published a story about the concerns of bagel makers and coffee roasters (brewers provided mixed reactions). Christopher Hendon, the MIT chemist interviewed for the story noted that several food-centric cities, especially when it’s soft, such as Melbourne, Australia, and Kyoto, Japan, as well as New York, identify strongly with their water and dryly opined that “San Francisco’s water is not particularly special.”
More recently, the PUC, following the lead of other California water agencies, is considering recycling wastewater for potable use. Staff is excited about the idea – in part because recycled water is a “drought-proof” supply. But they’ve found they need to reeducate some customers who want no changes to their pure “Hetch Hetchy” water.
It’s time for a bit of education and to change the narrative. San Francisco’s Regional Water System is not and has never been entirely derived from the Tuolumne River (where Hetch Hetchy is). The system receives about 15% of its supply from watersheds in Alameda and San Mateo Counties. And about 30% of its overall supply is filtered at the PUC’s Sunol and Harry Tracy Water Treatment Plants
What’s more, at the time of the 2017 Chronicle article and again for six weeks in 2019, no Tuolumne River water was flowing to the Bay Area. The system’s Mountain Tunnel was shut down for repairs and the PUC was supplying customers entirely from Bay Area reservoirs. Does anyone even notice a difference in the water when San Francisco switches its primary source?
Restore Hetch Hetchy is committed to protecting water quality as well as to replacing every last drop of San Francisco’s supply as part of a restoration plan. We are pleased to see that the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is also now involved in educating its customers that its water system is not all about “Hetch Hetchy”.
by danielcmckenzie | Dec 20, 2019 | Uncategorized
The House of Representatives engaged in last-minute, closed-door shenanigans as it passed a $1.37 trillion spending plan for 2020. The bill includes a ban on boating on Hetch Hetchy Reservoir – an opportunity we have promoted that would allow visitors to explore the spectacular canyon (as we continue to push for restoration).
At least when Congress passed the Raker Act in 1913, there was public debate. Not this time.
The bill claims to be about protecting water quality, but fails to note that San Francisco operates its own gas-powered boat on the reservoir. Our proposal was for non-polluting craft, such as canoes and kayaks, and a small electric-powered ferry.
The San Francisco Chronicle included the story on its front page today, and posted it online as well.
Our statement is below:
Statement of Restore Hetch Hetchy Regarding
Congress’ Exclusion of Public in Yosemite National Park
December 19, 2019
Background
The House of Representatives, at the behest of the City of San Francisco, has taken action behind closed doors to exclude park visitors from boating on Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in Yosemite National Park.
The provision to ban boating on the reservoir was included in a last-minute attachment to the House’s 2313-page appropriations bill. Passage of the bill is necessary to avoid a government shutdown and is expected to pass the Senate. The specific Hetch Hetchy language states:
Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. The Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, which is located in Yosemite National Park, is the drinking water source for 2.7 million Americans. Since the reservoir’s creation in 1923, boating has been prohibited to prevent the introduction of contaminants, and to date the quality of the water from Hetch Hetchy Reservoir is such that it does not require filtration. The Service is directed to maintain this longstanding prohibition.
Because it is attached to a one-year spending bill, the boating ban will expire at the end of 2020.
Statement of Spreck Rosekrans, Executive Director
San Francisco’s water quality claim is a ruse. Other water agencies safely allow boating on reservoirs throughout California and other states. Further, San Francisco operates its own gas-powered boat on the reservoir. Our proposal involves only quiet, non-polluting craft, including kayaks and canoes, which would allow visitors to explore currently inaccessible areas of Yosemite National Park.
Public access, including boating, was widely promised when Congress debated and ultimately passed the Raker Act allowing Hetch Hetchy Valley to be dammed and flooded – the only time in American history that such destruction has been allowed in any of our national parks. Members of Congress and specifically Representative Raker, the bill’s author, were assured that boating would be allowed. At San Francisco’s behest, Congress has unwittingly undermined the Raker Act, carefully negotiated a century ago, and sacrificed public access in Yosemite National Park.
The real reason San Francisco does not want environmentally friendly boating on Hetch Hetchy Reservoir is that they want to limit public access. If park visitors are allowed to explore Hetch Hetchy’s spectacular canyon, many will support emptying the reservoir and restoring the valley. San Francisco wants Hetch Hetchy to itself.
Restore Hetch Hetchy’s mission is to return the Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park to its natural splendor while continuing to meet the water and power needs of all communities that depend on the Tuolumne River.
by danielcmckenzie | Dec 13, 2019 | Uncategorized
It’s impossible to overstate the importance of getting support from water industry experts, especially leaders like Clark and Boronkay. They understand better than most that restoration can be accomplished without jeopardizing reliable water supplies for San Francisco or any other community. Their support works well to refute opponents who, too easily and too often, confuse their “water source” with a single reservoir.
As General Manager of Kern County Water Agency, Tom Clark was a fierce and often irreverent advocate for exporting water from the Delta into the Delta-Mendota Canal and the California Aqueduct His views were not popular among the environmental and fishing groups fighting to limit the amount of water extracted from the Delta.
Like so many of us, however, Tom loved Yosemite. So shortly after he retired, he joined the Advisory Board of Restore Hetch Hetchy. Tom said humbly and simply that he hoped he might be able to help negotiate a deal. It’s too bad he never had the chance, because he was one heckuva negotiator.
Sadly Tom passed away in 2011 after a battle with cancer. His memorial service, held at Buck Owens’ Crystal Palace in Bakersfield, was filled with water industry colleagues and as well as his obviously very close family. It seemed like everybody in the room told their own Tom Clark story – each one funnier or more outrageous than the last.
Several stories involved negotiating the controversial Monterey Agreement in which Tom acquired local control of the Kern Water Bank from the State. In doing so, Clark became a local hero. Many outside of Kern County, however, objected to both the process and the outcome of the closed door meetings.
Clark’s role in negotiating the Monterey Accord is recounted in “The Dreamt Land: Chasing water and dust across the West (Mark Arax, 2019). The book includes an amusing vignette that illustrates Clark all too well – that during the meetings he passed out pacifiers to his water agency adversaries when they “whined”!
The Monterey Accord and its cession of the Kern Water Bank from the State to local interests is an important story. Here’s a short summary:
- In 1991, the fifth year of a drought, the State Water Project had very little water to deliver. The SWP, operating under a system of “urban preference”, allocated a small amount of water to its urban customers and none to its farmers.
- The Kern County Water Agency, by far the SWP’s largest agricultural customer was apoplectic. On top of getting no water, they still had to pay a hefty fixed cost for the original construction of the project (essentially a mortgage payment for their share of the Oroville Dam, the Harvey O. Banks Pumping Plant and the California Aqueduct). Kern threatened to sue.
- Threatened by the lawsuit, in 1995 the State Water Project Contractors and the California Department of Water Resources held a set of closed door meetings in Monterey. At these meetings, Clark negotiated for the State to cede the Kern Water Bank, a massive aquifer conveniently located adjacent to the California Aqueduct, to private interests in Kern County.
- As part of his negotiating tactics or maybe just for fun, Clark handed out pacifiers to his counterparts when he perceived they were whining.
- The Kern Water Bank was handed over to its principal investors. Most prominent among them are Stuart and Lynda Resnick, California’s largest “farmers” and owners of the Wonderful Company. Wonderful’s website boasts that it is “making the world a better place, one brand at a time”. Wonderful also has many detractors. Mother Jones, for example, wrote a scathing article criticizing Wonderful for using more water than all homes in Los Angeles combined.
- In some ways, the Kern Water Bank is the poster child of how a water bank should work. The bank is recharged in wet years and can be drawn down in dry ones, providing additional reliability. The bank allows Wonderful and other farming companies to invest in valuable orchard crops with limited risk. Many, if not most, however, argue that these benefits should be in public hands and more evenly distributed.
Restore Hetch Hetchy will continue to work with water system experts to show that Hetch Hetchy Valley can be restored without sacrificing water supply reliability. Not a drop need be lost.
And if we are able to find ourselves in a strong negotiating position, we won’t be handing out binkies. It’s been done.
by danielcmckenzie | Nov 13, 2019 | Uncategorized
“Water Buffalo” Carl Boronkay supported restoration of Hetch Hetchy. Carl Boronkay was no typical tree-hugger.
Carl was a “water buffalo” – a term (sometimes endearing, sometimes not) given to the most powerful water industry people in California and the semi-arid west. From 1984 to 1993, Boronkay served as General Manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the nation’s largest water wholesaler serving 19 million people.
Yet Carl Boronkay supported restoration of Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park.
In 1987, while serving as General Manager, Carl wrote an editorial opinion for the Los Angeles Times, advocating a study of restoring Hetch Hetchy Valley. Titled, “LIKE MONO LAKE, LIKE HETCH HETCHY”, Boronkay explained that Hetch Hetchy is a “world treasure” and that “we, as a society, have the right and the duty to review decisions allocating the use of water held by the state in trust for the public.” He joined Restore Hetch Hetchy’s Advisory Committee in 2005, then helped with our ballot measure in San Francisco in 2012 and potential legislative solutions after the ballot measure failed.
Carl passed away in 2017, but he left an incomparable legacy at Metropolitan. When he took over, the agency’s sole role was managing imports from the Colorado River and Bay-Delta for cities in California’s southland. The six-year drought from 1987-92, however, was a wake-up call for Metropolitan, as it was for other water agencies. In addition, public support for providing water to waterfowl at Mono lake and to fisheries in the Bay-Delta was growing, threatening the reliability of water supplies.
Carl led Metropolitan’s efforts to diversify its system. Metropolitan changed. It negotiated with farmers, encouraging them to improve irrigation efficiency so a portion of their supply could be sold to cities. MWD also invested in groundwater recharge, locally, in the Mojave Desert and in Kern County. And, under Carl’s leadership, Metropolitan built Diamond Valley Reservoir in Riverside County. The reservoir holds 800,000 acre-feet, more than twice the volume of Hetch Hetchy Reservoir.
In a ceremony at Diamond Valley on October 16, Metropolitan honored Carl by naming the dam at its east end in his honor. The honor is well-deserved as Carl creatively and aggressively made changes to Metropolitan’s water system so it could better withstand droughts and meet environmental commitments.
The water industry needs more leaders like Carl Boronkay. Is anyone prepared to step forward? Anyone in San Francisco?
